From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 7 18:02:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA09949 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 18:02:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (root@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA09774; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 18:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA05844; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:52:13 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:52:11 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Satoshi Asami , ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tk80 port or tcl installation are broken on -current In-Reply-To: <14994.884221928@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Yes, I see the problem. No, I see no immediate solution that doesn't > have drawbacks of its own. Yes, I hate this entire problem and would > just as soon say "heck, just nuke TCL out of the base OS" if I had > a way of handling dist/ports dependencies currently in the tree. > The fact that I don't is why so many people are complaining that the > Handbook and FAQ have been left out of the doc dist since 2.2.2. As far as I see at this moment (maybe not so deeply as needed), there is only two things needed to fix this situation for -current. 1) Add --with-tcl=/usr/libdata/tcl to tk80 configure args 2) Install tclConfig.sh in /usr/libdata/tcl too from libtcl Makefile I don't check but it looks like working thing at least. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/