From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 16:36:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181FC106564A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42158FC16 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (exit2.ipredator.se [93.182.132.103]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508AC5B31 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:28:16 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:27:50 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120507162750.GA5400@external.screwed.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: 'pathservice get chrome_path' at runtime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:36:20 -0000 Hello. I have portinstalled chromium-18.0.1025.168 successfully on my freebsd-7.4 system. But running it makes me this: [30164:204283904:62148145523:FATAL:zygote_host_linux.cc(84)] Check failed: PathService::Get(base::FILE_EXE, &chrome_path). Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) I'm pretty sure it's a very obvious thing forgotten to be the reason of this. What should I do to tweak around this? Should the PathService to be a kind of a daemon I do not start by hand, e. g., fam/hald/dbus? No options were use for the port, it's a fresh install. Last time I tried to build chromium from linuxulator's jail, I was getting 'no implementaion for SOCK_DGRAM sockets of AF_UNIX family', same as sctp protocol but for localsockets. I think looking into the core dump is redundant and unnecessary, am I wrong? Any clues would be appreciated. -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627