From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 3 10:03:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA19742 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA19730 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:02:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com) Received: from gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com ([13.231.132.20]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <53648(6)>; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:02:19 PST Received: from gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (gnu [13.231.133.90]) by gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA27260; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 13:01:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (4.1/client-1.3) id AA15954; Mon, 3 Nov 97 13:01:15 EST Message-Id: <9711031801.AA15954@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> To: lf@get2net.dk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS vs. NT Client! In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Nov 1997 09:32:04 PST." Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:01:14 PST From: "Marty Leisner" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , you write: >Hi there, > >I am using a FreeBSD machine as an NFS server, and the server >seems to running quite smoothly. But the write performance from >Windows NT client (using ChameleonNFS) is *very* poor - but >reading from the NFS drives is no problem. > You don't quantify this with any numbers...How is the read performance? You also might want to look at samba and compare the two... marty