Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:47:59 -0800 From: VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why 24/192kHz sound is not a solution. Message-ID: <CAA7C2qjCbe_yJMCpKFj67aXtSBiWC%2BGwHMkACcerUGB3bWo1pg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote: > While searching why I cannot play 24bit source > (snd_hda, [AO OSS] Can't set audio device /dev/dsp > to s24le output, trying s16le... Still don't know why > though.) > > I've found really interesting piece of article, well > researched and precise: > > http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html > > I'm sure developers know about it already, but nonetheless > I think it's good find and pleasurable read. I don't know that using the mailing list to post links to articles is appropriate, but 24/192 does matter when it comes to processing. As only a final output format, that article is completely correct but to completely disregard 24/192 is misleading because it does have benefit earlier in the production chain.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAA7C2qjCbe_yJMCpKFj67aXtSBiWC%2BGwHMkACcerUGB3bWo1pg>