From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 27 10:45:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B914116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C9B43FB1
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:45:42 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from pir@pir.net)
Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim)
	id 1APR94-0006tc-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:45:42 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:45:41 -0500
From: Peter Radcliffe <pir@pir.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20031127184541.GA25839@pir.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <01b401c3b46d$a4ed5cc0$62c4033e@clarity>
	<20031127140905.GA95486@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
	<01c901c3b4f9$57066880$62c4033e@clarity>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01c901c3b4f9$57066880$62c4033e@clarity>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-fish: <darwin><
X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail.
Subject: Re: 4.9 Stable Crashes on SuperMicro with SMP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:45:43 -0000

Jonathan Gilpin <jonathan@fluent.ltd.uk> probably said:
> Tonight I will enable the second CPU again and see if I can find out
> more infomation... Could it be that a memory fault only occurr when
> the second CPU is enabled (ie: when Option SMP and option APIC_IO is
> enabled in the kernel)?

Cache problem on the 2nd CPU ?
Swap the CPUs and run on the other one in single processor mode ?

P.

-- 
pir