From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 21:53:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1B716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from wasley.bl.mmtr.or.jp (wasley.bl.mmtr.or.jp [210.228.173.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA89243FA3 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:53:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp) Received: (qmail 2343 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 14:53:27 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (202.229.16.132) by mx.bl.mmtr.or.jp with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 14:53:27 +0900 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:53:26 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031030.145326.63993249.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp> To: murray@freebsd.org From: Hideyuki KURASHINA In-Reply-To: <20031030045341.GE48267@freebsdmall.com> References: <20031030.074406.35715045.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp> <20031030045341.GE48267@freebsdmall.com> X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/public_key.txt X-PGP-Fingerprint: A052 6F98 6146 6FE3 91E2 DA6B F2FA 2088 439A DC57 X-URL: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.58 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: keve@mail.poliod.hu cc: www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 05:53:31 -0000 >>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:53:41 -0800, Murray Stokely said: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:44:06AM +0900, Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote: > > I also found FreeBSD 4.9 was not added to the past releases list in > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/index.html, and committed. > > It's not supposed to be. 4.9 is not a past release, it is a current > release. Someone made this error with 5.1 and it was never corrected, > but we don't need to follow that bad example. ;) Yep, fixed. Thanks, :-) -- rushani