From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 14:44:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BFB1065673 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320668FC39 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.22] (helo=12.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NuoIK-0005vS-3L; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:24 +0100 Received: from p57ae02fa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.2.250]:44923 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 12.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NuoIJ-00077A-Fk; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:20 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Alexander Pyhalov Message-ID: <20100325154420.6c91a7b9@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4BAB6135.4030800@rsu.ru> References: <4BAB6135.4030800@rsu.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd Ports Subject: Re: postgres and CVE-2010-0442 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:44:26 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:12:21 +0300 Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > Hello. > Could someone look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144863 > ? There is quite serious security issue in postgres, which allow any > user to kill others' sessions. > It's only been a week since it was assigned to the maintainer (girgen@) to look at. It's too soon for a maintainer timeout, although I suppose if this is considered to be an enormous security risk it could be committed without waiting. I'd say that's a decision for portmgr@ to make. -- Gary Jennejohn