From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 19:13:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F71316A4DA; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:13:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net (lakermmtao07.cox.net [68.230.240.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EAA43D48; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040816191322.CSOS1823.lakermmtao07.cox.net@mezz>; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:13:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:13:16 -0500 To: "Franz Klammer" References: <4120A1A5.2060002@webonaut.com> <1092664929.476.36.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120C7A5.2010504@webonaut.com> <1092667534.476.41.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120CD37.4040603@webonaut.com> <1092670330.476.69.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120E780.6020102@webonaut.com> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4120E780.6020102@webonaut.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 751) cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: pav@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please test gdesklets-0.30 on 4.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:13:29 -0000 On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:57:36 +0200, Franz Klammer wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >> calendar >> >> can't load sensor Calendar. >> > > found a solution/workaround: > Calendar try to import a module that doesn't exist any more in 0.30. > > attached a patch (hi! mezz ;-)). Thanks for create a patch! I shall commit it when 0.30 goes in the ports tree. Umm, a question, why do you remove the -O and *.pyo? > think we should not remove gdesklets-0.26 from ports tree instead > it should be still there a gdesklets-old or something like that. > i'm sure there are more desklets who cause problems after the update. Ack, it will creating more problems than it is solving so I agree with pav. :-) If some desklets are out of date and never get update, then those should be mark as BROKE or remove until it's fixed by add patch(es) or update by author(s). Only small part that I don't agree with pav is: 'So patching desklets to be compatible with both versions - yes' I rather to change this sentence to 'So patching desklets to be compatible with 0.30 or remove them - yes'. Cheers, Mezz > franz. -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org