Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:04:30 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, markm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openssh + krb5 (followup) Message-ID: <200003230804.KAA02712@grimreaper.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003221154360.58622-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> ; from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> "Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:55:49 PST." References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003221154360.58622-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > > Interoperability with MIT krb5 still seems to be an issue. > > > > Bleh, more FUD. The problem is in operability with non-FreeBSD openssh! > > We use supported_authentication values for KRB5 that neither Datafellows > > SSH nor OpenBSD SSH use. :-( > > Hmm..I thought OpenBSD's OpenSSH didn't support krb5, only > krb4. Regardless, we should fix this to bring ourselves in line > (preferably with both). As far as I can work out, OpenBSD uses OpenSSH+Kerberos to mean KerberosIV, whereas Datafellows meand Kerberos5. This would be a mistake made by OpenBSD, and one that is easy to fix. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003230804.KAA02712>