From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 17 11:48:46 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9328A106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1528FC13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:48:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from park.js.berklix.net (pD9FBFEAB.dip.t-dialin.net
	[217.251.254.171]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p4HBmhkZ051673;
	Tue, 17 May 2011 11:48:44 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
	by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4HBmco1057282;
	Tue, 17 May 2011 13:48:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4HBmN09095104;
	Tue, 17 May 2011 13:48:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <201105171148.p4HBmN09095104@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de>
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:10 BST."
	<20110517004910.GD94089@curry.linta.de> 
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:48:23 +0200
Sender: jhs@berklix.com
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Clean up old PRs 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:48:46 -0000

Hi Klaus, looks like you lost, so I restored:
	cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Reference:
> From:		"Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> 
> Date:		Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:10 +0100 
> Message-id:	<20110517004910.GD94089@curry.linta.de> 

"Klaus T. Aehlig" wrote:
> 
> Hallo,
> 
> > Might it be more useful be to somewhat redefine categories
> > 	category f - feedback  &
> > 	category s - suspended
> > [...]
> 
> speaking of those categories, but slightly off-topic: is there a chance
> to in some way automatically set PRs that have been set to "feedback,
> awaiting maintainer's feedback" back to open, once the feedback arrived?
> (E.g., my PRs ports/155469 and ports/155655 are still "feedback" despite
> the maintainer's answer 8 weeks ago.) This might also be some form of
> clean up. One could, e.g., use some heuristics, like a bug-follow-up
> from the maintainer's email-address or something similar.
> 
> Best,
> Klaus