From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr 24  3:45:40 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBD114C3F
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 1999 03:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spinner.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 392FF1F0B; Sat, 24 Apr 1999 18:45:32 +0800 (WST)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: alk@pobox.com
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: signal permissions 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Apr 1999 14:44:13 EST."
             <14112.52532.671480.997467@avalon.east> 
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 18:45:32 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Message-Id: <19990424104534.392FF1F0B@spinner.netplex.com.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Anthony Kimball wrote:
> 
> Here's a trial balloon: Anyone who can write to an executable file
> should be permitted to signal a derived process.

Umm, do you mean "could if not for ETXTBSY"?

Cheers,
-Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message