Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 18:50:47 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <4.1.19990302184855.00c4f9f0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <36DC8F1A.6B7C3EDC@newsguy.com> References: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> <4.1.19990302154522.03fb3730@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:23 AM 3/3/99 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: >I seem to recall that 2.2.8-RELEASE, which, mind you, was released >*after* 3.0-RELEASE, was announced to be the last 2.2.x-RELEASE. If >people didn't get a clue from that... They got a clue. And that clue was that they should stick with it until 3.x had settled, with the expectation that the ports would be maintained and patches would be available for any really egregious bugs or security holes. It ought to be the culmination of all the work done up to that point -- not abandoned, but considered to be a "golden" release that could be used for awhile. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990302184855.00c4f9f0>