From owner-cvs-all Tue Jun 22 1:26:49 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles519.castles.com [208.214.165.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1061511A; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA01443; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:23:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199906220823.BAA01443@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: hm@hcs.de Cc: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey), dfr@nlsystems.com, peter@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/isa sio.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:02:25 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:23:24 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Anyway, i don't think you are asking for too much - of what use is a shiny > new design of a new subsystem in the very basic FreeBSD architecture if just > some handful few people knew how it works and how to use it ? Gosh, that would make it just like every other shiny new subsystem. Folks, just cut the carping and write your own documentation. The architects can't, and won't write it for you. It has never happened that way (anywhere, on any project), and it never will. Documentation is written after the fact, by someone else. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message