From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 26 10:10:49 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from garm.bart.nl (garm.bart.nl [194.158.170.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A7B37B719; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:10:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.chronias.ninth-circle.org (root@cable.ninth-circle.org [195.38.232.6]) by garm.bart.nl (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2QIAWF66875; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:10:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.chronias.ninth-circle.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2QIAJG61498; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:10:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:10:19 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Will Andrews Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Seth Kingsley , "Brett G. Lemoine" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-commiters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why not cvs-stable@freebsd.org (was Re: proposals for fixing the PROBLEM..) Message-ID: <20010326201019.G48075@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20010323163104.B23438@meow.osd.bsdi.com> <20010326094602.A48075@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010326100335.P5821@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010326100335.P5821@ohm.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:03:35AM -0500 Organisation: Ninth-Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20010326 17:54], Will Andrews (will@physics.purdue.edu) wrote: [snip life is hard] >So, if the commit is on the stable branch in src/, >send it to cvs-stable. If the commit is on the current branch of ports, >send it to cvs-ports. And so on. Then for people like you or me or >curious/dedicated FreeBSD power users, we have an end-all, catch-all >cvs-[all,committers] list which is subscribed to all of the above. It's >not like it will add much more to log_accum.pl.. plus, didn't we used to >have things this way at some point in the past? Ah ok, this explains it better. Yes, that would work yes and provide better granularity. And this also illustrates the reason why you need context in an email. =P [Excessive snipping sucks.] -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai .oUo. asmodai@[wxs.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message