From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Sun Jan 28 21:26:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0B1EE00C3 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D546F5AA for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 13C02EE00C2; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02882EE00C1 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972536F5A6 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E146327CD2 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0SLQddG032859 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0SLQddA032858 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199872] devel/glib20 Apps using glib 2.42.2 crashing with 'pthread_mutex_lock' abort Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:26:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199872 --- Comment #35 from rozhuk.im@gmail.com --- (In reply to Guido Falsi from comment #32) Do you and gnome group understand situation!? This is not some small bug in freak port with few users. This BIG ANNOYING BUG that all users can see every day. They see that many apps is crashing and think: "whole FreeBSD is crap", bec= ause on Linux, mac and windows same does not happen so rarely. Even on windows 9= 8se explorer and apps was not crash on file operations. Is windows 98se better than FreeBSD 11 on desktop? How long you will use mac/windows and told here about some tests, right way= to apply and support patches!? As FreeBSD user on desktop I do not care about: "need tests with other port= s" and "I don't think it good to include this into ports" - just fix that cras= hes, what are you waiting for? Forget about glib legacy kqueue() FAM backend. Is is totally broken many ye= ars. Select between libinotify and my patch or let users to choose via options. Is it so difficult? This is a ticket of shame. IMHO. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=