Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:29:57 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r504198 - head/Mk Message-ID: <201906141929.x5EJTvZ5008442@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> of "Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:55:32 %2B0200." <alpine.LSU.2.21.1906141932170.3441@anthias.pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <alpine.LSU.2.21.1906141932170.3441@anthias.pfeifer.com>, Gerald Pfe ifer writes: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Does anything still depend on gcc49, 5 or 6 anymore? > > Yes and no. lang/gcc49 was pruned end of April, but lang/gcc48, > which is even older, is still in use by two ports, though at least > one is being worked on. > > I actually have a script running twice a week which checks such > dependencies. Here is its relevant output: > > 2 refer to GCC 4.8. > sysutils/memtest86+/Makefile:USE_GCC= 4.8 This will require a bit of effort. > sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve/Makefile:USE_GCC= 4.8 > > 0 refer to GCC 5. > > 1 refer to GCC 6. > print/pdftk/Makefile:USE_GCC= 6 > > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > IDK, but I'm very grateful to Gerald for that he does not prune those > > actual ports from the tree. I'm still happily using GCC 4.8/5 as my > > default USE_GCC ports since they works just fine. > > You're welcome, Alexey. Though the problem is users (!= danfe) > who sometimes use those older versions and then report all sorts > of interesting challenges. Indeed. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201906141929.x5EJTvZ5008442>