From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 13 11:32:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA04786 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 11:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jocki.domestic.de (kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de [194.233.216.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04750 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from joki@localhost) by jocki.domestic.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA03016; Tue, 13 May 1997 20:32:46 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.0 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <33785D3E.47F5@pop.ots.stream.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 19:34:36 +0200 (MET DST) From: Joachim Kuebart To: Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: POSIX Compliance Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, On 13-May-97 at 12:23:26 Aaron Nelson wrote: >A friend asked me the other day, "How POSIX compliant is FreeBSD?". I >could not answer him. Does anyone care to address that question for >me?? :^) FreeBSD is on it's way to be POSIX compliant. Many commands are already POSIX compliant (if so, the man page will say so). The libraries and header files can all be made to be POSIX compliant by use of a #define-statement. Blasts me how it's called :-) > >Thanks > >-A Welcome J ----------------------------------------------------------------------- For a world of pedigree OSs FreeBSD - top breeders recommend it Joachim Kuebart Tel: +49 711 653706 Germany