From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 09:28:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C6106566B; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6CE8FC1E; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAG9S8Sb079663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:03 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , Sahil Tandon , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:23 -0000 On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >> >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have >>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >> >> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking >> activity postconf wants to run? > > Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence > to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the > user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data > structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results. > > [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html That's entirely possible. Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD from now on. -- Pav Lucistnik