From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 7 18:48:18 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBFF37B401; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:48:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts16.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A002943F3F; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:48:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from t.vanderhoek@utoronto.ca) Received: from localhost.nowhere ([64.231.123.230]) by tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20030208024811.FYWD11926.tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost.nowhere>; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:48:11 -0500 Received: from localhost.nowhere (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.nowhere (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h182m185044145; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:48:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tim@localhost.nowhere) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h182lq6v044138; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:47:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:47:51 -0500 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Peter Wemm Cc: Mark Murray , Mikhail Teterin , obrien@FreeBSD.org, all-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, legacy-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access.ports Message-ID: <20030208024751.GA42535@turquoise> References: <200302071823.h17INlaX014720@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030207211024.37BAF2A8B4@canning.wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030207211024.37BAF2A8B4@canning.wemm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:10:24PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: [...] > > How will you keep current with ports developments? (Things like structure, > > procedures and so on?) > > .. and ports tree freezes. Which should, if memory serves, be sent to developers@, not cvs-ports@. Previous policy (often not followed) from asami was that all ports infrastructure changes were to be reviewed by ports@. AFAIK, port-mgr@ still feigns to follow this. That said, it does seem like bad karma to not even browse the subject lines of each commit message. -- If I could think of a two-line witty aphorism for you to remember me by, this would definitely be it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message