From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 17 14:57: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D80637B401; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by mail.imp.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5HLuwb31123; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:56:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from levais.imp.ch (levais.imp.ch [157.161.4.66]) by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5HLuv9014111984; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:56:57 +0200 (MES) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:58:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: Thomas David Rivers Cc: , Subject: Re: PATCH: wchar_t is already defined in libstd++ In-Reply-To: <200206172047.g5HKl4i52609@lakes.dignus.com> Message-ID: <20020617235725.F60170-100000@levais.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Uh... > > In standard C++, wchar_t is a keyword. So, there should be > no definition of wchar_t at all. I think this is the problem. > (You can't typedef a predefined keyword.) > > (Now - the compiler should certainly have the very same > idea of what a wchar_t is.. the same idea as the C typedef, > but that's a gcc configuration problem.) > > - Dave Rivers - > So my patches would be correct ? Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message