From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 16:23:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E2616A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC8843D1D for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:23:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004010500233001600ek75oe>; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 00:23:30 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AB4683A; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:23:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Marty Landman References: <6.0.0.22.0.20040104142759.1111d578@pop.face2interface.com> <20040104230340.93160.qmail@web14524.mail.yahoo.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20040104182413.02d37b50@pop.face2interface.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2004 19:23:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040104182413.02d37b50@pop.face2interface.com> Message-ID: <44hdzbtf99.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: starting daemons at server start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:23:37 -0000 Marty Landman writes: > Speaking of permissions, I've got my fbsd box set up with apache2 as a > local development environment. It's working great and would save me > tons of time u/l'g and testing changes remotely if I could keep my > hands off the darned config. :) I'm not an expert at Apache, exactly, but I can tell that you need to be more specific about the changes you're making, and why, before anybody can help you find a way to avoid doing that. > I bring this up because where I'm stymied with Apache is having to > workaround my failure to recompile it with suexec enabled by changing > file permissions to what they won't be on the live servers. That sentence is close to grammatically correct, but it's painfully contorted... What are you using suexec for (or what would you use it for)? A lot of workarounds tend to be just as much of a security concern as suexec is itself. > Just in case anyone's interested.... Well, no, but willing to help anyway... -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public"