From owner-freebsd-isdn Sat May 22 10:41:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from uni4nn.gn.iaf.nl (osmium.gn.iaf.nl [193.67.144.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CF414D93 for ; Sat, 22 May 1999 10:41:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wilko@yedi.iaf.nl) Received: from yedi.iaf.nl (uucp@localhost) by uni4nn.gn.iaf.nl (8.9.2/8.9.2) with UUCP id TAA18390; Sat, 22 May 1999 19:21:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from wilko@localhost) by yedi.iaf.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA14920; Sat, 22 May 1999 17:00:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wilko) From: Wilko Bulte Message-Id: <199905221500.RAA14920@yedi.iaf.nl> Subject: Re: V.110 and V.120 [Connecting a GSM modem with a freeBSD machine] In-Reply-To: <37455C6C.4DEAECF6@nl.compuware.com> from Bert Driehuis at "May 21, 1999 3:15:24 pm" To: bert_driehuis@nl.compuware.com (Bert Driehuis) Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 17:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG X-Organisation: Private FreeBSD site - Arnhem, The Netherlands X-pgp-info: PGP public key at 'finger wilko@freefall.freebsd.org' X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As Bert Driehuis wrote ... > Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > > V.110 is not supported by i4b. Although i remember that someone from NL > > at least read the specs ;-) > > Well, that was the V.120 spec (even though I have read the V.110 spec as > well, and it is equally unenlightening). > > My observation is that the ITU V.120 spec of 09/96 does not match what I > see when I trace a V.120 connection. This means I don't understand the > spec, probably; the alternate hypothesis being that noone bothers to > implement the spec. So, I'm not even going to touch this code unless > someone with access to a good protocol analyzer can give me a detailed > protocol trace of a V.120 connection between, say, a PC running the Teles > software and a Compuserve POP (and even *then* I'm not promising a thing). > > V.110 should be similar to V.120, but then again, one would expect V.120 > implementations to be similar to the spec as well :-) I use a Motorola BitSurfr Pro (bitsmurfer for some ;-) that can do V110 and V.120. Use it to pull email & news via UUCP from my ISP. Works OK for me. And has done so for years. It can also do PPP but that seems to be a lousy implementation (all who were at the '98 hackersparty in Arnhem will know..) In case anyone in Holland wants to give it a shot: I have a second (spare) Bitsurfr Pro for someone who wants to do tracing or so. But it is a loaner, after all it is my spare unit. | / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands - Powered by FreeBSD - |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte WWW : http://www.tcja.nl http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message