Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:56:18 +0800 From: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@tw.freebsd.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/centericq Makefile ports/net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34 Message-ID: <20040822155618.GA8748@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <41270448.7080501@portaone.com> References: <200408201956.i7KJupiA036894@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040821010059.GA52839@fatpipi.cirx.org> <41270448.7080501@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I just began to ask someone to test that patch=20
(Felipe Gustavo de Almeida <galmeida@a0z.org> give me). :)
In fact, I didn't feel bad about this, but maybe some policies
should described in committer's guide. The guide is my current
bible :p
Anyway, thanks to unbreak this port. I should prepare a 5.*
machine in future.
Regards,
clsung
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 11:14:00AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Vanilla I. Shu wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:56:50PM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >=20
> >>sobomax 2004-08-20 19:56:50 UTC
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >> Modified files:
> >> net/centericq Makefile=20
> >> Added files:
> >> net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34=20
> >> Log:
> >> Unbreak with gcc 3.4.
> >> Obtained from: Gentoo
> >> Based on: http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-im/cent=
ericq/files/centericq-4.9.12-gcc3.4.patch
> >=20
> > I know you unbreak this ports,
> >=20
> > but how about give a chance to our new committer(clsung)?
> >=20
> > and respect other committer?
>=20
> Well, considering the following factors:
>=20
> a) in no case this patch can make situation worser than it is already;
>=20
> b) port have been broken for the quite some time now, and the problem
> was already reported on mailing lists several times, so that maintainer
> certainly had his chance to act;
>=20
> c) I've sent patch to the author of the software, so that hopefully he
> will integrate it into the next official release.
>=20
> I decided that contacting maintainer doesn't worth it, I apologise if it
> caused any bad feelings to clsung. In general I think that there are
> cases (like this for example) when contacting maintainer is not quite
> necessary.
>=20
> -Maxim
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBKMIi+AeJ85Vui8ERAmEZAJ4lhZantiCa2NLUQMeKuGEKGZ3R2ACeLhBb
H7v8VzVvizLkQqasL+wna9A=
=Pd/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040822155618.GA8748>