From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 12 15:04:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C616A41F
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:04:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CCD43DB3
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:04:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk)
	by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD))
	id 1ElpDb-000KqX-TX
	for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:03:59 +0000
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1ElpDb-000DnG-Mf
	for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:03:59 +0000
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <E1ElpDb-000DnG-Mf@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:03:59 +0000
Cc: 
Subject: Any vital post 6.0 fixes gone into stable ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:04:28 -0000

I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production
use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is
a dot-nought release I was wondering if there is anything vital which
has been commited to stable, and if I should therefore sun the machines
under stable instead. I havent seen anything go past which I regard as
critical, though somebody did make a mention of some arp problem
being fixed, which I could find a reference to the original problem for.

Anything I need to know ? Am running release on a couple of machines here
and it works fine for me so far, but always good to get other opinions.

-pcf.