From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 12:54:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A3868F for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892088FC08 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D256940002 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id C7FD540004; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:48 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02A2340002; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Y7vVb5txgz8hVn; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id SRIVb12Ibok2; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Y7vVY5Q1Yz8hVm; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Y7vVY56drz9Ctj; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B23E22AFA; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50B0C395.8060809@daemonic.se> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:54:45 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: Questions about USB, uhid, ukbd and quirks References: <50B0001C.6050202@daemonic.se> <201211241213.49794.hselasky@c2i.net> <201211241317.00568.hselasky@c2i.net> <50B0BC44.2090609@daemonic.se> In-Reply-To: <50B0BC44.2090609@daemonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:54:50 -0000 On 11/24/12 13:23, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 11/24/12 13:17, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On Saturday 24 November 2012 12:13:49 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> On Saturday 24 November 2012 00:00:44 Niclas Zeising wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> I have a couple of questions about USB. >>>> I recently bought a new USB keyboard, a Logitech K120. When attaching >>>> this to a FreeBSD system, however, it is detected as a hid device >>>> (attaching to uhid) rather than a keyboard (attaching to ukbd). The >>>> keyboard works fine, but I'm just curious as to why it doesn't use >>>> ukbd. >>> >>>> The output from usbconfig for this keyboard is: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems the UHID driver needs to be synced with UMS and UKBD >>> regarding the >>> detection logic. Can you try the attached patch and report back. >>> >>> --HPS >> >> One more thing to check: >> >> /etc/devd/usb.conf >> >> Is perhaps auto-loading uhid before ukbd, and that might also be part >> of the >> issue. >> > > Hi! > Having ukbd in the kernel, and not uhid, makes uhid load as a module > during boot and attach to the keyboard, even with your patch. I'm > recompiling the kernel now with uhid as part of the kernel to see if it > makes a difference. I'm not too confortable hacking /etc/devd/usb.conf, > but if you can point me in the right direction I'll have a go at it. > Regards! Having uhid in the kernel did not make a difference, it attached to the keyboard (or rather, the keyboard attached to the uhid driver, I guess). Regards! -- Niclas