Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:00:51 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena <fports@paz.bz> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dspam install Message-ID: <4C3DDF33.4030706@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <20100713222839.GA19319@magic.hamla.org> References: <4C3A2EE7.7020104@paz.bz> <20100711212831.GA17226@magic.hamla.org> <AANLkTikNzfsunMHILOG6oUgJqPQLu9AZQWX0t50HxxRH@mail.gmail.com> <20100712230428.GB18432@magic.hamla.org> <AANLkTikSxrIkpzB-cFiGCwOrggv6-4qp-vgIw08HIIQa@mail.gmail.com> <20100713222839.GA19319@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sahil Tandon wrote: > [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d] > > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > >> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon <sahil@freebsd.org>: >>> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I >> saw this port I just didn't understand. > > What did you not understand? > >> I apologize for my english. > > No apology needed, as that is not the problem here. my own ports confusion (in general) is that in some ports you use a "-Dxxxxxx" to define a required (or not required) option while in others (at least dspam) you use WITHOUT_xxx or WITH_xxx=1. It would be nice if all ports has the same standard of definitions. Or... am I confused?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C3DDF33.4030706>