Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 12:02:33 -0800 (PST) From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer) To: dufault@hda.com (Peter Dufault) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCSI ASC-ASCQ descriptions Message-ID: <m0rocnZ-0003x2C@TFS.COM> In-Reply-To: <199503141145.GAA06400@hda.com> from "Peter Dufault" at Mar 14, 95 06:45:32 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > J Wunsch writes: > > > > I rather thought of an LKM to interpret the ASC's. Syslogd could > > load it... :-) At least, the strings are no longer _static_ then. nice idea, but we need it earlier then that, as Peter says... > > I tried it this morning. It adds 4982 bytes of kernel bloat > to put all the "additional sense code"/"additional sense > code qualifier" descriptions in the kernel. I wonder if compression would help in any way? there are lots of words that are common.... e.g. "ready, audio, logical, unit, required, progress, error, not " I'm really tempted to make a program to do this... :) (and print it) > > Shall I commit this? yes, I would, but it might be good top make an option to leave it out.. (a SMALL option?) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0rocnZ-0003x2C>