From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 19 01:16:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (p213.54.240.227.tisdip.tiscali.de
	[213.54.240.227])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BB143F85
	for <freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:16:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org)
Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAJ9GXRV002217;
	Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:16:33 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org)
Message-Id: <200311190916.hAJ9GXRV002217@peedub.jennejohn.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Markus Dolze <markus@mdolze.de>
In-Reply-To: Message from Markus Dolze <markus@mdolze.de> 
   of "Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:35:22 +0100." <3FBAACBA.7060603@mdolze.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:16:33 +0100
From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>
cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD <freebsd-isdn.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isdn>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:16:38 -0000


Markus Dolze writes:
> I have just tried to upgrade to 5.1-RELEASE (no patches yet).
> 
> I use rbch to connect via user-land ppp (tun0). If I try to make a
> connection, I get the error:
> 
> Nov 19 00:16:23 <kern.crit> arwen kernel: i4b-L3 T303_timeout: SETUP not
> answered, cr = 73
> Nov 19 00:16:23 <kern.crit> arwen kernel: i4b-L3 next_l3state: FSM
> illegal state, state = ST_U0 - Null, event = EV_T303EXP - T303 timeout!
> 
> And the call is disconnected. PPP then tries to redial and the
> connection is established.
> 
> Attached are hints (from device.hints), kernel and isdnd.rc config
> files. I use an old non-pnp AVM Fritz card (isic-driver).
> 
> Any help?
> 

Does this happen _every_ time?

Are you using rbch and ppp for channel bonding? If not I'd suggest
using an isp interface. That's the way I do it.

---
Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de