From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 23 20:30:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53C0413 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from John.Kitz@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843AE2E32 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard (costa.xs4all.nl [82.95.89.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9NKU7xs001961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:30:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from John.Kitz@xs4all.nl) From: "John W. Kitz" To: Subject: FreeBSD distribution for ARM processors. Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:30:08 +0200 Message-ID: <001d01ced02e$aaf29260$00d7b720$@Kitz@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac7QLqpqed/X8wKjSCOnB5zriCDImg== Content-Language: nl X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: John.Kitz@xs4all.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:30:10 -0000 Hi, Can someone please explain the rationale behind not providing a distribution for arm based systems, as it seems somewhat illogical to me that distributions are available for ia64, powerpc, sparc64 (see http://www.freebsd.org/where.html) which are considered Tier 2 architectures while the official reason for arm being a Tier 2 architecture is the fact that no distribution is provided for it (see http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/arm.html). Assuming this message ends up on some distribution list please cc me on the reply since I'm not subscribed to it. Thanks in advance, Jk.