From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 00:45:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E3916A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C1D43D1D for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:45:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from localhost by pandora.cs.kun.nl via odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] with ESMTP id i028jCBk008993 (8.12.10/3.58); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 09:45:12 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 09:25:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401020925.16503.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: david Subject: Re: Status of linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:45:18 -0000 On Friday 02 January 2004 05:03, david wrote: > servers. The main problem I can forsee is when running a 32bit linux > binary on the 64bit system. Will this work at all and if so what issues > can I expect. As soon as I get the amd64 machine I'll do my own tesing, > but in the mean time, what do you guys have to say? Peter sent in a blurb a while back about the intentions. Basically, FreeBSD 32-bit binary support is top of the list, then when that works, Linux 32 i scheduled to be worked on. See the previous "Linux emulation status" thread here. -- pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot If the door is ajar, can we fill it with door-jamb?