From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon May 15 20:50: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9D937B580 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:50:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA39063; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:50:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005160350.UAA39063@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tim Vanderhoek Subject: Re: kern/16928: dynamic sysctl enhancement Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/16928; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Vanderhoek To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org Cc: vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu Subject: Re: kern/16928: dynamic sysctl enhancement Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 23:42:02 -0400 (EDT) > > Description > >A patch to create dynamic sysctl nodes at runtime Hmm. Do you have suggestions of sample situations where the ability to create dynamic sysctls would be useful? [Be sure to include freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org in the Cc of your reply]. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message