From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 11 15:35:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA22994 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:35:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22889 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07817; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 23:11:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199804112211.XAA07817@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: goldfish@value.net cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: If my network is connected with NE2000, should NATD be run over , ppp0? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Apr 1998 13:47:20 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 23:11:09 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > My ISP connects to me through kernel ppp, my home PC (besides the gateway > PC) connects through a NE2000 card (one on each machine). > > Which interface should I run NATD on? ed0 or ppp0? Please copy me. natd is run on the ``public'' interface - the one with the valid address. Looks like ppp0 in your case. -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message