From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 24 18:46:04 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13D54D2
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E685DE1
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0OIjwJM081678;
 Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:45:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <51018166.4000706@rawbw.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:45:58 -0800
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why DTrace sensor is listed but not called?
References: <50FEEB6C.7090303@rawbw.com>
 <CAFMmRNxvLU4WA7uV3TkixEz6vh8NDc+ARM_b2d8igHAMXKy-EQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNxvLU4WA7uV3TkixEz6vh8NDc+ARM_b2d8igHAMXKy-EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:46:04 -0000

On 01/22/2013 16:03, Ryan Stone wrote:
> Offhand, I can't of why this isn't working.  However there is already a way
> to add new DTrace probes to the kernel, and it's quite simple, so you could
> try it:

Thank you for this information, this works.

As for my previous approach, there is a bug in gcc that static empty 
functions with 'noinline' attributes get eliminated by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56099

Yuri