From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 17 06:34:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612B9A8586A for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB401C91 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-101-208.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.101.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084713D05C; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 07:34:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u0H6YSm8001925; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 07:34:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 07:34:28 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Benfell Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unexpected dependencies of graphics/libGL Message-Id: <20160117073428.ba76224e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <569B3231.9010400@parts-unknown.org> References: <20160117031923.ce1f36547351bf07b6fff9a0@ime.usp.br> <20160117070715.1c33732b.freebsd@edvax.de> <569B3231.9010400@parts-unknown.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:34:31 -0000 On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:18:25 -0800, David Benfell wrote: > On 01/16/2016 10:07 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > If the maintainer considers certain software essential for building, > > the required stuff is not optional anymore - no matter if the programs > > in question are _actually being used_ or not... > From my very brief time messing with RPMs, a distinction was made > between build dependencies and execution dependencies. I'm not clear > here whether FreeBSD's pkg system makes that distinction but it might be > a useful one to make. The FreeBSD ports collection makes the distinction between B-Deps (build dependencies) and R-Deps (run dependencies). The precompiled packages typically contain references to the run dependecies, but leave out the build dependencies which you don't need to actually _run_ the software. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...