From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 18 02:40:09 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2DE61F0;
 Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661EAB5B;
 Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.135.70] (unknown [94.19.235.70])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D2D75C002;
 Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:40:01 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <54BB1CFE.6060106@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:39:58 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
Organization: FreeBSD
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Could mount_msdosfs be less cryptic and more compatible with
 fsck_msdosfs?
References: <54BAE6DE.3050206@FreeBSD.org> <20150118003637.GB94793@in-addr.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150118003637.GB94793@in-addr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:40:09 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 18.01.2015 03:36, Gary Palmer wrote:

>> I could not mount FAT32 image, but "fsck_msdosfs" says, that it
>> is valid, good FAT32 image.
>> 
>> % sudo fsck_msdosfs /dev/md0 ** /dev/md0 ** Phase 1 - Read and
>> Compare FATs ** Phase 2 - Check Cluster Chains ** Phase 3 -
>> Checking Directories ** Phase 4 - Checking for Lost Files 7
>> files, 96256 free (188 clusters) % sudo mount -t msdosfs /dev/md0
>> /mnt mount_msdosfs: /dev/md0: Invalid argument %
>> 
>> I don't know what should I do to mount this image.
>> 
>> I'm using 10-STABLE.
> 
> Did you check dmesg?  Sometimes filesystems give more detail in
> kernel logs than is possible through error codes.
  Yep, nothing.

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov AKA Black Lion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=C61A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----