Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:00:15 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD equivalents of autoconf, automake, etc. Message-ID: <20041218140015.GA3543@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20041217235243.GA89288@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20041118160531.GA43779@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041118101808.11092f21@dolphin.local.net> <20041118163221.GB45289@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041118165953.GA46467@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <419CE10A.20803@mukappabeta.de> <20041217235243.GA89288@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-12-17 23:52, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> wrote: > : system? Autoconf (and automake/libtool) was, as originally > : intended, designed to ease cross-platform portability. > > I'm starting to wonder. But if I want to work on my new project at > home, I'll need to come up with some kind of a system. It'll be > running on Linux at work, and BSD at home. Hi Jonathon, Autoconf and automake are not the only cross-platform makefile handling tools. The X11 distribution uses Imake. You might want to take a look at Imake too, for multi-platform projects.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041218140015.GA3543>