From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 30 13:55:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CED37B479 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA133488; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:55:07 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20001030123305.23573c0e.steveo@eircom.net> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:55:06 -0500 To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Small patch to lpr - comments, review, commit ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:38 PM -0500 10/30/00, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >In fact, I'm inclined to say both the 'C' and 'P' lines should >be moved out of that conditional block. The only thing that >really triggers a header sheet is the 'L' line, and there are >other processes which might want that 'P' line to be there even >if the header sheet is off. Er, that isn't quite right. I keep confusing 'P' lines with 'L' lines, as shown by the fact that I talk about moving the 'P' line when the 'P' line isn't even IN the conditional... I can't move the 'L' line, but the update that Steve wrote to move the 'C' line should be fine. I'll make the change unless someone sees a problem with it. It still won't make it into 4.2, though :-) --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message