From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 18 13:26:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp [133.30.50.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A48714CFB for ; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 13:26:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp) Received: from libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp (cs22130.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [202.219.4.46]) by shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA28555; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 05:15:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.9.1/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id FAA24081; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 05:20:22 +0900 (JST) From: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp Message-Id: <199904182020.FAA24081@libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> To: Nick Hibma , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, dfr@nlsystems.com Subject: Re: newbus and modem(s) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:01:38 +0200." Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 05:20:20 +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Nick Hibm a wrote: >> Why would I say it wasn't ready? Because outside of core (apparently), >> nobody was warned/told that this was going to be committed in a few >> days/hours/minutes. >I've ported the newconfig style USB code of NetBSD to FreeBSD and I >really prefer the newbus style, because it is truly dynamic. Simple Question. If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver, Can the vendor make the Host controller recognized without changing usb.c code? #That's what frustrated me while writing driver for smbus controller. Takanori Watanabe Public Key Key fingerprint = 2C 51 E2 78 2C E1 C5 2D 0F F1 20 A3 11 3A 62 2A To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message