From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 23 23:03:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A753106566C for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44708FC12 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.75 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QDlrZ-000HqB-DH for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:03:41 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:01:58 +0200 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <834458221.20110424010158@nitronet.pl> To: Jeremy Chadwick In-Reply-To: <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> References: <926783796.20110423022501@nitronet.pl> <20110423005422.GQ91591@over-yonder.net> <2910134705.20110423090442@nitronet.pl> <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" Subject: Re: buildworld FAIL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:03:43 -0000 Hi Jeremy, >> So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. > I would classify this as a bug/oversight that should be properly dealt > with via an #error statement or similar -- the current result (what > you've reported) is not acceptable. Possibly WITHOUT_HAST could be > created and worked into the appropriate frameworks. > And again, please see about cleaning up your make.conf and moving the > appropriate settings to src.conf. src.conf(5) man page should help you. > The variables are not named 100% identical either, so don't just > copy-paste. I understand "it's a machine from the FreeBSD 4.x days", > but that's no excuse for lazy administration. Try to keep up. :-) Well, yeah, there's ZFS-on-root here, IPMI and other new stuff around here, but make.conf was passed on from generation to generation. I suppose it's about time to move on to src.conf, I had this thought about a year ago :) - some prodding with warnings or errors after make buildworld could be nice ;) Thanks for clarification of the situation.