Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 21:59:26 +0200 From: Jeroen Hofstee <linux-arm@myspectrum.nl> To: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence Message-ID: <556A169E.8030909@myspectrum.nl> In-Reply-To: <1432289148.5304.58.camel@opteya.com> References: <1430820315.19516.26.camel@opteya.com> <CAL_Jsq%2BT5c7qornpRVCduEjUSCeM%2B0xqbtVYovtH76y=4BqhLQ@mail.gmail.com> <1432289148.5304.58.camel@opteya.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 22-05-15 12:05, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Le mardi 05 mai 2015 à 11:41 -0500, Rob Herring a écrit : >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> >> wrote: >>> I believe Device Tree Blob (.dtb file) built from kernel's Device >>> Tree >>> Sources (.dts, which #include .dtsi, which #include .h) using >>> Device >>> Tree Compiler (dtc) are covered by GNU General Public Licence v2 >>> (GPLv2), but cannot find any reference. >> By default yes, but we've been steering people to dual license them >> GPL/BSD. >> > obviously these files should be reusable. If there is a license issue with that it should be fixed. cc-ing freebsd-arm@freebsd.org. I am not a lawyer, Jeroen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?556A169E.8030909>