Date: 31 Mar 2002 12:38:24 +0200 From: Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@hackerheaven.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, "A.Z." <synfin@unixroute.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kldxref problem Message-ID: <1017571105.901.4.camel@loki.ipv6.hackerheaven.org> In-Reply-To: <3CA6BFE4.8296DF74@mindspring.com> References: <20020330205329.D51062-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> <3CA6BFE4.8296DF74@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-5g0nAbT2alwveyEEOC/3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 09:51, Terry Lambert wrote: >=20 > Perhaps if the kernel printf also "ignored" the request to print > the little S.O.B. out, there would be less confusion... I'm still sticking to the idea that one could test for kldxref, and if it isn't there, don't execute it. [ -x /usr/sbin/kldxref ] && /usr/sbin/kldxref like so, which is perfectly sane bourne shell syntax, which is also used by BSD make. Like someone else says, work around it or deal with the users that don't get the (ignored) part. Just my .02 Euro's Cheers, Emiel --=-5g0nAbT2alwveyEEOC/3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8puceXhj4b9ZSY0oRAnNrAJ9ic8RQH+J23LPNWNDz6hYd8Xg57wCfeXdh P/UlDqRbZ/OoRDQ+vfCVF4E= =PSUU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5g0nAbT2alwveyEEOC/3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1017571105.901.4.camel>