From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 24 14:16:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA20697 for security-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 14:16:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security) Received: from burka.rdy.com (burka.rdy.com [205.149.163.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA20691 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 14:16:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@burka.rdy.com) Received: by burka.rdy.com id OAA26764; (8.8.7/RDY) Fri, 24 Oct 1997 14:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710242116.OAA26764@burka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: bug in 2.2.5? In-Reply-To: from Tim Baur at "Oct 24, 97 01:33:20 pm" To: tbaur@ESGROUP.NET (Tim Baur) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 14:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Class: Fast Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@best.net From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tim Baur writes: > I just jumped on this list, so sorry if this issue has already been > brought up. It has some to my knowledge that there is a security bug in > version 2.2.5-REL and 2.2.5.1-REL is due shortly. Could someone explain > what this bug pretains to? Problem with open() syscall. > > Tim Baur > ESI Communications > -- dima