Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:05:14 -0700 From: Charles Henrich <henrich@flnet.com> To: Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux Development environtment Message-ID: <19990610100514.C9686@orbit.flnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906100954450.62549-100000@eccles.salk.edu>; from Tom Bartol on Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 10:01:35AM -0700 References: <19990610091221.B8851@orbit.flnet.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906100954450.62549-100000@eccles.salk.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On the subject of Re: Linux Development environtment, Tom Bartol stated:
>
> Hmmm... could you be more explicit about exactly what you did to get this
> working. I've got linux_lib-2.6 and linux_devel-0.2 on a 3.2-STABLE
> system. In the link step after compiling I get things like:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x35): undefined reference to `__fpu_control'
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x3b): undefined reference to `__setfpucw'
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x43): undefined reference to `__libc_init'
>
> and
>
> /usr/lib/libc.so: undefined reference to `__progname'
>
> I get this from a freebsd /bin/sh shell or a /compat/linux/bin/sh shell.
>
> Any assistance would be most appreciated.
I deleted the links /compat/linux/usr/lib/libc.so and
/compat/linux/usr/lib/libm.so and relinked them as
ln -s ../../lib/libc.so.5.4.23 and libm.so.5.0.8
I ran in a FreeBSD shell with /compat/linux/bin and /compat/linux/usr/bin in
my path first.
I had no LD_LIBRARY_PATHs set.
And it worked like a charm to compile all sorts of nasty linux stuff
(compiledl inuex to link with linux commercial libraries).
Charles Henrich Manex Visual Effects henrich@flnet.com
http://orbit.flnet.com/~henrich
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990610100514.C9686>