From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 04:02:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4871E16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx) Received: from les.ath.cx (15.61.205.61.west.global.alpha-net.ne.jp [61.205.61.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE24043D49 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:02:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx) Received: by les.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0945986618; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:01:59 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:01:59 +0900 From: YONETANI Tomokazu To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060926040159.GE1080@les.ath.cx> References: <1157154024.835.6.camel@atomizer.opensourcebeef.net> <20060924071601.GA1080@les.ath.cx> <20060924205903.GY1045@tigerfish2.my.domain> <20060925111048.GD1080@les.ath.cx> <7579f7fb0609251606t2913858boaa2e6d71914d0fa6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0609251606t2913858boaa2e6d71914d0fa6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: LSI 1030 mpt doesn't work if I build a new kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:02:02 -0000 On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:06:11PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Um- I'm still trying to find a real error here. The bootverbose simply > lists selection failures for devices that don't exist. Other than > that, I cannot see what you are claiming is an error. No, they don't contain error message, they're just there to hopefully give you hints about our hardware (and I couldn't find a way to include the real error message in the dmesg output without hitting the panic at that time :). The real visible problems are: - random I/O errors during disk activity; buildworld almost immediately terminates because of the error. sometimes it leads to a panic in softupdates code. - error messages to the console: (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): CAM Status 0x34 (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): CAM Status 0x34 (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): error 5 (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): error 5 (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted (da0:mpt0:0:0:0): error 5 If I raise dev.mpt.0.debug from 4(the default) to a higher value than 5, the above errors stop popping up, although it spams the message buffer. Changing it to 5 doesn't seem to change the amount of the message the driver spews. Regards. > On 9/25/06, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:59:03PM -0500, Bruce Burden wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:16:01PM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > >> > > >> > Recently I tried installing FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE on an IBM X335 in my > >> > office and tried to upgrade to 6.2-PRERELEASE, and found that although > >> > it doesn't hang or panic during boot, running I/O intensive > >applications > >> > (including buildworld) ends up in an I/O error, and eventually > >panicked and > >> > rebooted. > >> > > >> This would be best on -STABLE, which the 6x thread is. Anyway, > > > >But I found that the snapshot from September 5 still has the similar > >issue, so I'd imagine that the driver in -CURRENT still has the problem, > >though I'm speaking without knowing how much changes have been made since > >the last MFC. I need to set up a machine which can build current -CURRENT > >to be sure. > > > >> I have: > >[snip] > >> FreeBSD tigerfish2.my.domain 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #6: Sun Aug > >27 11:03:43 CDT 2006 > > > >Thanks for the suggestion, I put mine at > > http://les.ath.cx/FreeBSD/mpt/ > > > >> and have not had any problems with the mpt device. The controller is > >> built into the Tyan S2895/Thunder K8WE board. > >> > >> I am not using the Seagate drive - it will be used to hold the > >> AMD64 installation when I get around to doing that, while the IBM > >> drive will continue to hold the i386 install if I need to switch > >> back. The RAID holds user data, and is not an issue when performing > >> kernel builds. > >> > >> Have you tried to install the 6.1 release from CD/DVD? > > > >Not yet, but I doubt it'll make it through to the end because of the > >I/O error issue. > > > >Cheers. > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"