From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 22:05:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3567416A4CE for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:05:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1943D4C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id o.79.373c6637 (3866); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:05:16 -0500 (EST) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <79.373c6637.2eb6bb9c@aol.com> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:05:16 EST To: davids@webmaster.com, tedm@toybox.placo.com, chat@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:05:31 -0000 The implication that the copyright holder of every O/S owns the copyright to every application and device driver that runs on it because they require the O/S to work is so stupid that I can't believe that any of you have convinced yourself that there is an argument that can be made that supports it. The GPL is designed to scare people into donating their code. Please come to terms with it. And please stop CCing me on this.