From owner-freebsd-gnome Tue Oct 1 15:57:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1985937B401 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B30D43E65 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:57:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.2.1.2] (vpn-client-2.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.2]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g91MrAiv001448 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:53:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Subject: GNOME 2.1 upgrade From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 01 Oct 2002 18:57:34 -0400 Message-Id: <1033513054.343.16.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What do people think of upgrading the GNOME 2 components to the just-released GNOME 2.1 versions? This is the development version that will become GNOME 2.2. This will involve updating components such as pango and gtk2. This may not be acceptable. Another alternative is to create -devel versions of the 2.1 components. Of course, this will create pains when upgrading. It should be noted that the 2.1 and upcoming 2.2 components will be _source and binary_ compatible with the 2.0 components. Thoughts? Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message