From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 1 14:07:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2BA16A4DA for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsledge@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1434D43D46 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:07:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsledge@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so289014nfc for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bTbQ6GsSfpNDR5dmThj/Kk3W3heceXrOgR5GrZK8kOqI+fuyxOBV0tEHFA/s88QRG5L06QViLwROPvC2kN1iXZ5Oycv7tVxOq2Sd5HTWhciaqqd+4UuKk0XGaFdeltLSqWXsDsFWhINOq5z8ejRN1byUs88Cw5DzBWK9Y3jGqo8= Received: by 10.49.8.4 with SMTP id l4mr760815nfi; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.34.7 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <970c0a6b0608010707q14c38c23i4ea3e1749868428d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:07:14 -0400 From: "David Sledge" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44CF5ED5.7000400@appriss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44CF5ED5.7000400@appriss.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:07:16 -0000 > > > I made the port directory eclipse3.2 so that eclipse 3.1.2 can > > still be installed if people have problems with the new version. > > [...] Also, would it be better to submit it as an update to the > > existing eclipse port or leave it as a new port eclipse3.2? > > That is not a good idea to have two versions of Eclipse in our > ports tree because there are 26 ports depending on Eclipse. So > basically if you have two versions of Eclipse you'll have 54 ports > to maintain instead of 27. AFAICT it is too big an effort for the > FreeBSD Eclipse community. > > Best regards, > -- > Jean-Baptiste Quenot > aka John Banana Qwerty > > I will move the eclipse3.2 port to eclipse and recreate the shar. When I am done I will post it on a website for people to download and try out. I should have it available early this afternoon. Thank you for the information.