Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:22:53 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor) Message-ID: <20101122182253.GA18188@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20101122052649.GA61979@comcast.net> References: <4CE7EC0D.9000203@a1poweruser.com> <4CE969B6.90900@kc8onw.net> <AANLkTik7wfhm8hp-Kwfu8HerqYftiYXTCwT6Q83t7Hmv@mail.gmail.com> <201011211909.23708.beech@akherb.com> <20101122052649.GA61979@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:26:49PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > E.g., why not send an email requesting resubmission in the proper > format? A lot of committers do try to do just that. There is no automated process, however. > Many of the of oldest unassigned but still-open PR's show no evidence > that they've even been looked at by a committer. In that case you might post a followup, after some period of time, and ask for specific review. > How can we know which PR's were rejected/not picked up for some reason > and which ones were genuinely overlooked? Right now, you can't. OTOH there are various ways to browse the PRs (web pages, periodic postings.) The counter-argument to this is that we get 40+ PRs per day. Ones that seem easy and/or well-prepared are probably going to get handled more quickly. That's just the reality when dealing with such a large number of PRs. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101122182253.GA18188>