From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 6 12:19:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA13162 for security-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 12:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [140.174.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA13151 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 12:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA13000; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 12:08:41 -0700 Received: from kechara.flame.org by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA03594; Tue, 6 Aug 96 15:08:39 EDT Received: (from explorer@localhost) by kechara.flame.org (8.7.5/8.6.9) id PAA10136; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 15:08:34 -0400 (EDT) To: Chris Layne Cc: David Greenman , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: am I the only one? References: From: Michael Graff Date: 06 Aug 1996 15:08:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Chris Layne's message of Tue, 6 Aug 1996 02:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.36/Emacs 19.31 Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Chris Layne writes: > > 1024 bit keys do take a bit of time to decrypt. Get a faster computer... > > > > -DG > > Oh okay! I never thought it would have been easier! :P Anyway of > decreasing the key length? Oh come on... Even a slow 386 can barely notice the difference between a 1024 and 768 bit key... --Michael