Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:03:17 -0700
From:      Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com>
To:        Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>
Cc:        <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Jan Behrens <jbe-mlist@magnetkern.de>
Subject:   Re: IPv6 in jails
Message-ID:  <16b9fef3ba2685ead7b5292d4d75c149@udns.ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200321043502.GA51499@admin.sibptus.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:35:02 +0700 Victor Sudakov vas@sibptus=2Eru said

> Jan Behrens wrote:
> >=20
> > > Can you then do a jexec test4 and run service sshd restart and see if=
 it=20
> > > starts working?
> >=20
> > I experienced the same problem as discussed in this thread when I set
> > up IPv6 with my server=2E Strangely, when I rebooted the host system and
> > simply started the jails one after the other (with a freshly booted
> > host system), the problem didn't occur, but maybe that was just random=2E
> >=20
> > A "service sshd restart" inside the jail always seemed to help, which
> > is why I also assumed there was some sort of race condition=2E But maybe
> > it is related to some addresses being in use yet when restarting a jail=
?
>=20
> Does this happen only with IPv6 jail addresses?
FWIW I never experience this on IP4, with some 7 jails starting simultaneou=
sly=2E
But I'm also using pf, nat, and rdr=2E If that should that make a difference=2E

--Chris
>=20
> --=20
> Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
> 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas=2Etomsk=2Eru/





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16b9fef3ba2685ead7b5292d4d75c149>